Homepage           Business           Finance           Insurance           Legal           Real Estate           Communications           Health           Travel
HIPAA in a "Nutshell
Fixing Our Regulator
Which Government Age
Federal Trade Commis
Business Wars in the
Too Old to Drive? Se
Legal Problems The N
Employment Law: What
Sarbanes Oxley (SOX
Bankers Need to Chan
All Service Provider
Sarbanes Oxley And I
The Fair Debt Collec
Regulatory Requireme
Competitive Advantag
Corporate Governance
How to Prepare for a
What is the Securiti
The BAFE SP203 Stand
5 Facts About NPI Fo
7 Steps To NPI For H
 
  home>Legal>Regulatory Compliance>
SEC Wanted More Board of Directors Who Were Not Insiders; Unintended Consequence

The Securities and Exchange Commission thought it might be a nifty idea for Corporate Board of Directors to have fewer insiders on them so they would serve the will of the shareholders and not allow corporate executives to do so much hanky panky and keep getting such big bonuses. Unfortunately, as nice as this little nifty idea was it is somewhat a socialist projection into the American Corporate Board Rooms.

Now we see that at Hewlett Packard, a Board of Director not so beholden to the company has been spying and giving priviledged, insider and proprietary information to news reporters who then put it out on the Associated Press undermining the company and causing stock prices to drop, therefore hurting shareholders equity and share valuations. Whoops? Looks like the law of Unintended Consequences due to over regulation and meddling rears its ugly head again.

But the story gets worse. The CEO of the company wanted to find out who was leaking information and a private investigator was hired. Turns out the private investigator used pre-texting and that really goes against the grain of regulators trying to curb identity theft, even though Federal Regulators use the very same trick to track down abuses.

Looks the SEC, which wanted more Board of Directors in American Corporations who were not Insiders now has egg on their face for pushing such a policy in the first place, but we should not be so surprised, as this is just one of hundreds of regulations, which results in the Law of Unintended Consequences. Consider all this in 2006.


PRV:Business Wars in the Market Place; Online Gambling VS the Gaming Industry in the   NEXT:Which Government Agency is in Charge of Recalling Certain Products?
Copyright
Cyber Law
Intellectual Property
Patents
Personal Injury
FriendLink:
Copyright©2008 lntac, All Rights Reserved. mailto:admin@lntac.com.